https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102058 A writ of prohibition will not lie to stop adjudication under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 where the authority has prima facie jurisdiction and the petitioner's recorded statement provides material linking him to the alleged contravention; objections of duress or inadmissibility must be raised in the adjudicatory and appellate process. The Court also declined to order release of seized cash pending adjudication because the amount was the subject of the proceedings and could be liable to confiscation or penalty if the case succeeded. The proceedings were allowed to continue and no interim return of the seized amount was granted. en-us Wed, 21 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:55:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102058 A writ of prohibition will not lie to stop adjudication under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 where the authority has prima facie jurisdiction and the petitioner's recorded statement provides material linking him to the alleged contravention; objections of duress or inadmissibility must be raised in the adjudicatory and appellate process. The Court also declined to order release of seized cash pending adjudication because the amount was the subject of the proceedings and could be liable to confiscation or penalty if the case succeeded. The proceedings were allowed to continue and no interim return of the seized amount was granted. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 21 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102058