<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 409 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102055</link>
    <description>Imported brass scrap containing 5% iron impurity was assessed as &#039;Drink&#039; grade rather than &#039;Honey&#039; grade because the applicable specifications permitted up to 5% iron in &#039;Drink&#039; grade scrap, while &#039;Honey&#039; grade required freedom from iron and other specified contaminants. Classification had to be made on the actual condition of the goods at the time of import, not on a hypothetical post-import removal of impurities. On that basis, the proposed value enhancement, duty demand, redemption fine and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:47:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 409 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102055</link>
      <description>Imported brass scrap containing 5% iron impurity was assessed as &#039;Drink&#039; grade rather than &#039;Honey&#039; grade because the applicable specifications permitted up to 5% iron in &#039;Drink&#039; grade scrap, while &#039;Honey&#039; grade required freedom from iron and other specified contaminants. Classification had to be made on the actual condition of the goods at the time of import, not on a hypothetical post-import removal of impurities. On that basis, the proposed value enhancement, duty demand, redemption fine and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>