https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102053 The court found evidence of abuse of fiduciary power by the third respondent in altering the shareholding pattern through additional capital issuance. An interim administrator, a retired judge, was appointed to manage the company, assisted by the third respondent and another administrator. Costs were awarded to the petitioners and the ninth respondent, to be borne by the third respondent. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:40:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102053 The court found evidence of abuse of fiduciary power by the third respondent in altering the shareholding pattern through additional capital issuance. An interim administrator, a retired judge, was appointed to manage the company, assisted by the third respondent and another administrator. Costs were awarded to the petitioners and the ninth respondent, to be borne by the third respondent. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 23 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102053