<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 384 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102032</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value for imported components could not be rejected merely because the importer and supplier were related. The valuation authorities had to show material indicating that the relationship influenced the price or that extra consideration passed beyond the invoiced amount. Imports for assembly and imports of spare parts operated at different commercial levels, so the assumption that both must carry the same price was erroneous. The importer&#039;s separate procurement channels and pricing method supported acceptance of the declared value, and the transaction value was held to be acceptable on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:50:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 384 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102032</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value for imported components could not be rejected merely because the importer and supplier were related. The valuation authorities had to show material indicating that the relationship influenced the price or that extra consideration passed beyond the invoiced amount. Imports for assembly and imports of spare parts operated at different commercial levels, so the assumption that both must carry the same price was erroneous. The importer&#039;s separate procurement channels and pricing method supported acceptance of the declared value, and the transaction value was held to be acceptable on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>