<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 383 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102031</link>
    <description>Coercive recovery of the disputed demand was restrained pending disposal of the stay petition, as recovery action was not to proceed until the stay application was finally considered. Where part of the demand was stated to be pending before the High Court, the matter was directed to await further consideration, and the authorities were instructed not to adopt coercive methods in the meantime.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:48:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 383 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102031</link>
      <description>Coercive recovery of the disputed demand was restrained pending disposal of the stay petition, as recovery action was not to proceed until the stay application was finally considered. Where part of the demand was stated to be pending before the High Court, the matter was directed to await further consideration, and the authorities were instructed not to adopt coercive methods in the meantime.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>