<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 382 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102030</link>
    <description>A settlement certificate under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme barred further proceedings only for the quantified tax arrears it covered; proceedings concerning seized goods and the unquantified portion of the show cause notice were expressly kept alive. Because the impugned adjudication related to that excluded portion, the dispute was not fully and finally concluded under the Scheme. The principle of double jeopardy therefore did not apply, and adjudication on the seized goods remained maintainable against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:46:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 382 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102030</link>
      <description>A settlement certificate under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme barred further proceedings only for the quantified tax arrears it covered; proceedings concerning seized goods and the unquantified portion of the show cause notice were expressly kept alive. Because the impugned adjudication related to that excluded portion, the dispute was not fully and finally concluded under the Scheme. The principle of double jeopardy therefore did not apply, and adjudication on the seized goods remained maintainable against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>