<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 478 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102003</link>
    <description>Tariff classification of silk-embroidered boxes follows their specific commercial and tariff description as jewellery boxes under Chapter Heading 42.02, rather than textile made-ups under the DEPB product group. Goods covered by Heading 42.02 are excluded from Section XI by Section Note 1, and the boxes do not meet the definition of &quot;made-ups&quot; in Section Note 7 because their essential character remains that of boxes despite silk embroidery. Textile covering alone does not convert an article into a textile made-up. The classification claimed as textile made-ups was rejected and the original customs classification as jewellery boxes was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:34:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 478 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102003</link>
      <description>Tariff classification of silk-embroidered boxes follows their specific commercial and tariff description as jewellery boxes under Chapter Heading 42.02, rather than textile made-ups under the DEPB product group. Goods covered by Heading 42.02 are excluded from Section XI by Section Note 1, and the boxes do not meet the definition of &quot;made-ups&quot; in Section Note 7 because their essential character remains that of boxes despite silk embroidery. Textile covering alone does not convert an article into a textile made-up. The classification claimed as textile made-ups was rejected and the original customs classification as jewellery boxes was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>