<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 478 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102003</link>
    <description>Silk-embroidered boxes exported as jewellery boxes were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 42.02, not as textile made-ups under DEPB product group 89/75. The classification turned on the specific commercial and tariff description of the goods, which remained boxes in essential character despite silk embroidery. Section Note 1 excluded articles covered by Chapter 42.02 from Section XI, and the goods did not satisfy the definition of &quot;made-ups&quot; in Section Note 7 of Section XI. The view that textile material alone converted the article into a textile made-up was rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:34:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 478 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102003</link>
      <description>Silk-embroidered boxes exported as jewellery boxes were held classifiable under Chapter Heading 42.02, not as textile made-ups under DEPB product group 89/75. The classification turned on the specific commercial and tariff description of the goods, which remained boxes in essential character despite silk embroidery. Section Note 1 excluded articles covered by Chapter 42.02 from Section XI, and the goods did not satisfy the definition of &quot;made-ups&quot; in Section Note 7 of Section XI. The view that textile material alone converted the article into a textile made-up was rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=102003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>