<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 271 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101992</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up a company under sections 433(c), (e), and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner alleged mismanagement and insolvency, citing the company&#039;s suspension of business since 1983. However, the court found potential for business resumption based on the company&#039;s assets, pending recoveries, and ongoing disputes. It rejected the petitioner&#039;s claims of insolvency and lack of revival prospects, considering the interests of shareholders and creditors. The court emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the company&#039;s inability to pay debts or the disappearance of its substratum, ultimately denying the winding-up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=139041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 271 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101992</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up a company under sections 433(c), (e), and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner alleged mismanagement and insolvency, citing the company&#039;s suspension of business since 1983. However, the court found potential for business resumption based on the company&#039;s assets, pending recoveries, and ongoing disputes. It rejected the petitioner&#039;s claims of insolvency and lack of revival prospects, considering the interests of shareholders and creditors. The court emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the company&#039;s inability to pay debts or the disappearance of its substratum, ultimately denying the winding-up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>