https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101991 The court quashed the impugned order due to the lack of objective material for "satisfaction" under section 10(b) of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976. It found a breach of natural justice principles as no show-cause notice was given, and reasons were not provided in the order. The court emphasized the importance of objective material, adherence to natural justice, and statutory compliance. The appeal was allowed with costs, highlighting the necessity for proper justification and fair play in exercising powers under the Act. en-us Fri, 21 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:20:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101991 The court quashed the impugned order due to the lack of objective material for "satisfaction" under section 10(b) of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976. It found a breach of natural justice principles as no show-cause notice was given, and reasons were not provided in the order. The court emphasized the importance of objective material, adherence to natural justice, and statutory compliance. The appeal was allowed with costs, highlighting the necessity for proper justification and fair play in exercising powers under the Act. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101991