https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101977 A request to modify a stay order by introducing fresh evidence of financial hardship was rejected because the material, a profit and loss account for the year ending 31 March 2001, had not been produced when the stay application was first heard. The tribunal found no satisfactory explanation for the earlier non-production and held that a stay application cannot be considered in piecemeal. As no valid cause was shown for withholding the evidence initially, the plea to reopen the matter on financial hardship grounds was declined. en-us Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:10:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101977 A request to modify a stay order by introducing fresh evidence of financial hardship was rejected because the material, a profit and loss account for the year ending 31 March 2001, had not been produced when the stay application was first heard. The tribunal found no satisfactory explanation for the earlier non-production and held that a stay application cannot be considered in piecemeal. As no valid cause was shown for withholding the evidence initially, the plea to reopen the matter on financial hardship grounds was declined. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101977