https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101973 Imported ink-jet printers were examined for tariff classification between Heading 84.43, covering printing machinery, and Heading 84.71, covering automatic data processing machine units. The importer failed to produce convincing evidence linking the manufacturer's literature and invoice description to the specific consignments, and a prior bill of entry was held insufficient to establish identity of goods for the present import. On that evidence, the importer did not prima facie rebut the departmental classification under Heading 84.71, and the customs classification was sustained. en-us Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:04:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101973 Imported ink-jet printers were examined for tariff classification between Heading 84.43, covering printing machinery, and Heading 84.71, covering automatic data processing machine units. The importer failed to produce convincing evidence linking the manufacturer's literature and invoice description to the specific consignments, and a prior bill of entry was held insufficient to establish identity of goods for the present import. On that evidence, the importer did not prima facie rebut the departmental classification under Heading 84.71, and the customs classification was sustained. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101973