https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101962 A power of attorney lacking the statutory presumption had to be proved through other admissible evidence, and the plaintiff satisfied that burden by producing the original minutes book recording the board's authorisation and by showing that the signatory was competent to verify the plaint. Books of account alone were insufficient to fasten liability, but dishonoured cheques supporting the admitted dues established liability of defendants Nos. 1 to 3, together with contractual interest at 18% per annum from the date of supply until realisation. No decree could be passed against defendant No. 4 because he had already paid the price to the other defendants, and double recovery was impermissible. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:53:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101962 A power of attorney lacking the statutory presumption had to be proved through other admissible evidence, and the plaintiff satisfied that burden by producing the original minutes book recording the board's authorisation and by showing that the signatory was competent to verify the plaint. Books of account alone were insufficient to fasten liability, but dishonoured cheques supporting the admitted dues established liability of defendants Nos. 1 to 3, together with contractual interest at 18% per annum from the date of supply until realisation. No decree could be passed against defendant No. 4 because he had already paid the price to the other defendants, and double recovery was impermissible. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101962