<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 280 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101939</link>
    <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is described as a quasi-criminal, purposive provision aimed at speedy recovery of company property; on that construction, heirs and legal representatives who continue to retain such property may be proceeded against. The note also states that a limitation objection was not accepted because continued occupation close to the filing date raised a mixed question of fact and law, and a stay of prosecution was declined since the civil suit was filed after the complaint and no special circumstance justified delaying proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:30:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 280 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101939</link>
      <description>Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 is described as a quasi-criminal, purposive provision aimed at speedy recovery of company property; on that construction, heirs and legal representatives who continue to retain such property may be proceeded against. The note also states that a limitation objection was not accepted because continued occupation close to the filing date raised a mixed question of fact and law, and a stay of prosecution was declined since the civil suit was filed after the complaint and no special circumstance justified delaying proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>