<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 278 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101937</link>
    <description>Order 29, Rule 1 CPC allows a director or principal officer of a company to sign and verify pleadings, but it does not itself authorise institution of a suit; specific corporate authority by board resolution, articles or ratification is required, and in the absence of such proof the plaint is unauthorised. A contract of insurance is concluded only on unqualified acceptance of the proposal and communication of that acceptance; where alleged cover notes were not proved to have been delivered, the premium cheque was not encashed, and the surrounding evidence did not show completed cover before the fire, no binding insurance contract arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 278 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101937</link>
      <description>Order 29, Rule 1 CPC allows a director or principal officer of a company to sign and verify pleadings, but it does not itself authorise institution of a suit; specific corporate authority by board resolution, articles or ratification is required, and in the absence of such proof the plaint is unauthorised. A contract of insurance is concluded only on unqualified acceptance of the proposal and communication of that acceptance; where alleged cover notes were not proved to have been delivered, the premium cheque was not encashed, and the surrounding evidence did not show completed cover before the fire, no binding insurance contract arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>