<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 793 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101931</link>
    <description>On a prima facie review, mere negotiation with the foreign buyer and execution of a memorandum of agreement with the exporter were held insufficient to show conscious participation in any overvaluation of exported garments for excess drawback. In the absence of direct evidence of conspiracy, the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty and stay of its recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:11:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 793 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101931</link>
      <description>On a prima facie review, mere negotiation with the foreign buyer and execution of a memorandum of agreement with the exporter were held insufficient to show conscious participation in any overvaluation of exported garments for excess drawback. In the absence of direct evidence of conspiracy, the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty and stay of its recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>