<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 786 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101925</link>
    <description>Nickel perforated cylinders manufactured and used within the same factory for textile printing fell within the exemption for gravure printing cylinders and nickel perforated rotary cylinder screens used in the factory of production. The later notification relied on by the department could not be applied retrospectively to earlier clearances. On the recorded finding of in-factory use, the exemption applied and the duty demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 786 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101925</link>
      <description>Nickel perforated cylinders manufactured and used within the same factory for textile printing fell within the exemption for gravure printing cylinders and nickel perforated rotary cylinder screens used in the factory of production. The later notification relied on by the department could not be applied retrospectively to earlier clearances. On the recorded finding of in-factory use, the exemption applied and the duty demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>