<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 780 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101919</link>
    <description>The company having been wound up by order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the appellate proceedings abated under Rule 22 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 because no application for continuation of the proceedings was filed. The order records that, in the absence of such an application after winding up, the appeal could not proceed and therefore stood abated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 780 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101919</link>
      <description>The company having been wound up by order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the appellate proceedings abated under Rule 22 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 because no application for continuation of the proceedings was filed. The order records that, in the absence of such an application after winding up, the appeal could not proceed and therefore stood abated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>