<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 344 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101915</link>
    <description>The court rejected the petition, finding it not maintainable due to improper motives of the petitioners, lack of crystallized debt, and genuine disputes raised by the company. The court emphasized that winding-up petitions should not be used to recover disputed debts and penalized the petitioners with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:32:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 344 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101915</link>
      <description>The court rejected the petition, finding it not maintainable due to improper motives of the petitioners, lack of crystallized debt, and genuine disputes raised by the company. The court emphasized that winding-up petitions should not be used to recover disputed debts and penalized the petitioners with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>