<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 307 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101908</link>
    <description>Article 20(3) protects only natural persons capable of personal testimony and testimonial compulsion, so an incorporated company or other body corporate cannot claim the privilege against self-incrimination when accused of an offence. The Court held that a company, as a juristic person, cannot make oath or affirmation or give oral evidence through personal perception, and is not a witness merely because it is required to produce documents. The same protection also does not extend to directors, officers, or employees who are not arraigned as accused or co-accused, because the company remains a separate legal entity and its personnel cannot be treated as the company for this purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:05:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 307 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101908</link>
      <description>Article 20(3) protects only natural persons capable of personal testimony and testimonial compulsion, so an incorporated company or other body corporate cannot claim the privilege against self-incrimination when accused of an offence. The Court held that a company, as a juristic person, cannot make oath or affirmation or give oral evidence through personal perception, and is not a witness merely because it is required to produce documents. The same protection also does not extend to directors, officers, or employees who are not arraigned as accused or co-accused, because the company remains a separate legal entity and its personnel cannot be treated as the company for this purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>