https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101902 The court set aside the winding-up petition against the appellant company, ruling that the petition was not legitimate due to the bona fide dispute of debt and mala fide intentions behind it. The court found that the issues raised were triable in a civil court and the company judge erred in ordering the winding up without adequately considering relevant agreements. The appellant company's defense was deemed substantial, leading to the dismissal of the winding-up petition with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 02 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:51:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101902 The court set aside the winding-up petition against the appellant company, ruling that the petition was not legitimate due to the bona fide dispute of debt and mala fide intentions behind it. The court found that the issues raised were triable in a civil court and the company judge erred in ordering the winding up without adequately considering relevant agreements. The appellant company's defense was deemed substantial, leading to the dismissal of the winding-up petition with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101902