<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 351 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101893</link>
    <description>The court held that legal proceedings could continue against the partnership firm and its partners despite a winding up order against the private limited company. Section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 was interpreted to apply only to the company under winding up. The court approved the receiver&#039;s report, ordered the sale of the partnership firm&#039;s goods, and outlined the sale process. The plaintiff was directed to cover sale expenses, and the receiver&#039;s fee was set at Rs. 5,000. Each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:39:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 351 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101893</link>
      <description>The court held that legal proceedings could continue against the partnership firm and its partners despite a winding up order against the private limited company. Section 446(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 was interpreted to apply only to the company under winding up. The court approved the receiver&#039;s report, ordered the sale of the partnership firm&#039;s goods, and outlined the sale process. The plaintiff was directed to cover sale expenses, and the receiver&#039;s fee was set at Rs. 5,000. Each party was to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>