<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 332 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101879</link>
    <description>Employees of nationalised banks were treated as public servants under clause (12)(b) of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The analysis read section 2 of the Corruption Act with the Banking Regulation Act, including sections 46A and 51, and held that the limited deeming provision for Chapter IX of the Penal Code did not exclude the wider statutory definition. A harmonious construction of the banking statutes and the Penal Code avoided an anomalous difference between Penal Code liability and corruption prosecution, so the challenge to prosecution failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 332 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101879</link>
      <description>Employees of nationalised banks were treated as public servants under clause (12)(b) of section 21 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for purposes of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. The analysis read section 2 of the Corruption Act with the Banking Regulation Act, including sections 46A and 51, and held that the limited deeming provision for Chapter IX of the Penal Code did not exclude the wider statutory definition. A harmonious construction of the banking statutes and the Penal Code avoided an anomalous difference between Penal Code liability and corruption prosecution, so the challenge to prosecution failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>