<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 439 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. It emphasized that the enhancement of value must be based on concrete evidence of contemporaneous imports and not merely on quotations or coerced admissions. The penalties and confiscation orders were also set aside, reinforcing the need for thorough and fair investigations in customs valuation matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:58:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 439 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. It emphasized that the enhancement of value must be based on concrete evidence of contemporaneous imports and not merely on quotations or coerced admissions. The penalties and confiscation orders were also set aside, reinforcing the need for thorough and fair investigations in customs valuation matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>