https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101865 The court addressed concerns of oppressive conduct in company affairs under sections 397, 398, and 433 of the Companies Act. The petitioners sought reliefs such as share transfer and director removal. Disputes arose over evidence presentation, with petitioners advocating for affidavits. The court emphasized fairness and cross-examination, denying the prayers and imposing costs on petitioners for lack of justification. The judgment stressed adherence to legal processes and principles in resolving corporate disputes, emphasizing proper procedure and the importance of fairness. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:39:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101865 The court addressed concerns of oppressive conduct in company affairs under sections 397, 398, and 433 of the Companies Act. The petitioners sought reliefs such as share transfer and director removal. Disputes arose over evidence presentation, with petitioners advocating for affidavits. The court emphasized fairness and cross-examination, denying the prayers and imposing costs on petitioners for lack of justification. The judgment stressed adherence to legal processes and principles in resolving corporate disputes, emphasizing proper procedure and the importance of fairness. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101865