https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101846 The company court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition under section 257 of the Companies Act, 1956, as not all company matters fall under its exclusive jurisdiction. The High Court clarified that unless a matter is specified in the Act to be dealt with by the company court, it cannot exercise jurisdiction solely because it relates to a company. The High Court held that the appeal was maintainable despite the single judge's lack of jurisdiction finding, emphasizing that the question of jurisdiction is for the court to decide. The interpretation of section 10 of the Companies Act affirmed that the company court's jurisdiction is limited to specified matters in the Act or rules. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:03:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101846 The company court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition under section 257 of the Companies Act, 1956, as not all company matters fall under its exclusive jurisdiction. The High Court clarified that unless a matter is specified in the Act to be dealt with by the company court, it cannot exercise jurisdiction solely because it relates to a company. The High Court held that the appeal was maintainable despite the single judge's lack of jurisdiction finding, emphasizing that the question of jurisdiction is for the court to decide. The interpretation of section 10 of the Companies Act affirmed that the company court's jurisdiction is limited to specified matters in the Act or rules. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 12 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101846