<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 668 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101840</link>
    <description>Exemption and concessional duty notifications apply only on strict satisfaction of their express conditions and the linked policy provisions. For Notification No. 25/99-Cus., the concessional rate for aluminium foils imported by a manufacturer of capacitors was unavailable because the appellant was not a capacitor manufacturer and no material showed such use. For Notification No. 2/95-C.E., the exemption for goods sold in India by a 100% export-oriented unit under specified Export-Import Policy paragraphs did not apply because the clearances were made under a different policy paragraph. The duty demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 668 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101840</link>
      <description>Exemption and concessional duty notifications apply only on strict satisfaction of their express conditions and the linked policy provisions. For Notification No. 25/99-Cus., the concessional rate for aluminium foils imported by a manufacturer of capacitors was unavailable because the appellant was not a capacitor manufacturer and no material showed such use. For Notification No. 2/95-C.E., the exemption for goods sold in India by a 100% export-oriented unit under specified Export-Import Policy paragraphs did not apply because the clearances were made under a different policy paragraph. The duty demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>