https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101831 The court granted an injunction restraining the respondent from enforcing Election Rules that exceeded statutory requirements under the Companies Act. The judgment held that the rules contravened the Act by imposing additional conditions on proxies beyond what was specified in Schedule IX. Any actions conflicting with statutory provisions were deemed void, emphasizing the supremacy of the Companies Act over inconsistent company actions. The impugned Election Rules were deemed ineffective, and the petitioner was granted relief. The court clarified that revocation of proxies did not require the printed form provided by the company. en-us Fri, 24 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:45:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101831 The court granted an injunction restraining the respondent from enforcing Election Rules that exceeded statutory requirements under the Companies Act. The judgment held that the rules contravened the Act by imposing additional conditions on proxies beyond what was specified in Schedule IX. Any actions conflicting with statutory provisions were deemed void, emphasizing the supremacy of the Companies Act over inconsistent company actions. The impugned Election Rules were deemed ineffective, and the petitioner was granted relief. The court clarified that revocation of proxies did not require the printed form provided by the company. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 24 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101831