<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 550 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101830</link>
    <description>Registration of salt pans as part of factory premises turned on the scope of &quot;factory&quot; under excise law and the effect of the exemption-related notification relied on by the department. The authority noted the assessee&#039;s contention that the salt pan area was integrated with gypsum manufacture used in caustic soda production, but held that the registration request could not be declined without a fair opportunity to meet objections and without considering relevant submissions. The rejection of inclusion of the salt pans in the registration certificate was set aside and the matter was remitted to the proper officer for fresh consideration by a speaking order in accordance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 550 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101830</link>
      <description>Registration of salt pans as part of factory premises turned on the scope of &quot;factory&quot; under excise law and the effect of the exemption-related notification relied on by the department. The authority noted the assessee&#039;s contention that the salt pan area was integrated with gypsum manufacture used in caustic soda production, but held that the registration request could not be declined without a fair opportunity to meet objections and without considering relevant submissions. The rejection of inclusion of the salt pans in the registration certificate was set aside and the matter was remitted to the proper officer for fresh consideration by a speaking order in accordance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>