https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101811 Section 113 of the Companies Act, 1956 was construed as imposing a statutory duty on the company to complete and keep share certificates and debentures ready for delivery, and as enabling the person entitled to apply for an order directing such delivery. The provision was read as including delivery itself, and the 1988 amendment was treated as clarificatory. A subsisting civil court injunction did not, by itself, bar recourse to section 113 where it did not prohibit institution of proceedings, although it could justify refusal of ancillary relief such as action concerning dividends or other restrained matters. en-us Wed, 13 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:07:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101811 Section 113 of the Companies Act, 1956 was construed as imposing a statutory duty on the company to complete and keep share certificates and debentures ready for delivery, and as enabling the person entitled to apply for an order directing such delivery. The provision was read as including delivery itself, and the 1988 amendment was treated as clarificatory. A subsisting civil court injunction did not, by itself, bar recourse to section 113 where it did not prohibit institution of proceedings, although it could justify refusal of ancillary relief such as action concerning dividends or other restrained matters. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 13 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101811