https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101803 The High Court held that the trial court lacked jurisdiction under section 10 of the Companies Act to entertain a suit challenging the removal of a director under section 283. The plaintiff's claim fell within the jurisdiction of the High Court or empowered district courts, not the civil court. The appellate court vacated the injunction granted by the trial court, emphasizing that district courts do not typically handle disputes related to company affairs unless specifically authorized. The Civil Revision Application by the plaintiff was dismissed, and the defendants' application was allowed, maintaining the status quo until a specified date. en-us Wed, 30 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:00:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101803 The High Court held that the trial court lacked jurisdiction under section 10 of the Companies Act to entertain a suit challenging the removal of a director under section 283. The plaintiff's claim fell within the jurisdiction of the High Court or empowered district courts, not the civil court. The appellate court vacated the injunction granted by the trial court, emphasizing that district courts do not typically handle disputes related to company affairs unless specifically authorized. The Civil Revision Application by the plaintiff was dismissed, and the defendants' application was allowed, maintaining the status quo until a specified date. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 30 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101803