https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101795 The appeal was allowed in a case involving a dispute over the quality and delivery of goods supplied. The court found no merit in the respondent's contentions, dismissed the winding-up petition, but ordered the respondent to make certain deposits. Upon appeal, the winding-up petition was admitted, with further proceedings left to the company judge, including the consideration of appointing a provisional liquidator and summoning directors for statements. No costs were awarded in the decision. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:49:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101795 The appeal was allowed in a case involving a dispute over the quality and delivery of goods supplied. The court found no merit in the respondent's contentions, dismissed the winding-up petition, but ordered the respondent to make certain deposits. Upon appeal, the winding-up petition was admitted, with further proceedings left to the company judge, including the consideration of appointing a provisional liquidator and summoning directors for statements. No costs were awarded in the decision. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 03 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101795