https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101785 Sections 391 and 392 of the Companies Act, 1956 empowered the company court to issue directions needed to implement a sanctioned compromise or arrangement, including removal of unauthorized encroachments on company property when those encroachments obstruct sale and distribution of assets. The existence of a remedy under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act did not bar this special supervisory jurisdiction. The occupants, having admitted the company's title and relying only on adverse possession, failed to prove open, continuous and hostile possession for the statutory period; their possession was therefore unauthorized and no legal right to remain was established. en-us Tue, 25 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:31:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101785 Sections 391 and 392 of the Companies Act, 1956 empowered the company court to issue directions needed to implement a sanctioned compromise or arrangement, including removal of unauthorized encroachments on company property when those encroachments obstruct sale and distribution of assets. The existence of a remedy under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act did not bar this special supervisory jurisdiction. The occupants, having admitted the company's title and relying only on adverse possession, failed to prove open, continuous and hostile possession for the statutory period; their possession was therefore unauthorized and no legal right to remain was established. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 25 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101785