<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 344 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101782</link>
    <description>Dumper tyres could qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q only if the dumpers and crushers were used within the factory limits as defined by the Central Excise law. Their eligibility turned on the factual location of the crushers and the approved factory plan: if the crushers were inside the factory, the dumpers would be treated as used for in-factory transport of raw material, supporting credit; if outside, the claim would fail. The record did not conclusively establish the decisive facts, and the matter was remanded for fresh verification and reconsideration in accordance with law, with the earlier orders set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:28:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 344 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101782</link>
      <description>Dumper tyres could qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q only if the dumpers and crushers were used within the factory limits as defined by the Central Excise law. Their eligibility turned on the factual location of the crushers and the approved factory plan: if the crushers were inside the factory, the dumpers would be treated as used for in-factory transport of raw material, supporting credit; if outside, the claim would fail. The record did not conclusively establish the decisive facts, and the matter was remanded for fresh verification and reconsideration in accordance with law, with the earlier orders set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>