https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101781 The Tribunal directed the Registry to consider forming a Larger Bench to address conflicting views on post-clearance adjustments and unjust enrichment. The refund claim of Rs. 1,34,521 not collected from the customer was deemed eligible for refund despite the rejection of the overall claim based on the doctrine of unjust enrichment. en-us Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:09:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101781 The Tribunal directed the Registry to consider forming a Larger Bench to address conflicting views on post-clearance adjustments and unjust enrichment. The refund claim of Rs. 1,34,521 not collected from the customer was deemed eligible for refund despite the rejection of the overall claim based on the doctrine of unjust enrichment. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101781