https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101761 The court dismissed the Civil Revision Petitions (C.R.Ps) filed by the defendant, upholding the lower court's decision. Despite lacking Central Government approval, Mr. Ananthasivan was deemed competent to sign and verify the pleadings on behalf of the plaintiff company as he could depose to the facts of the case. The court emphasized the signatory's ability to attest to the facts as the key requirement for verifying pleadings, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents. This affirmed the validity of the suit brought by the plaintiff company, Cardamom Marketing Co. (Travancore) Ltd. en-us Tue, 20 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101761 The court dismissed the Civil Revision Petitions (C.R.Ps) filed by the defendant, upholding the lower court's decision. Despite lacking Central Government approval, Mr. Ananthasivan was deemed competent to sign and verify the pleadings on behalf of the plaintiff company as he could depose to the facts of the case. The court emphasized the signatory's ability to attest to the facts as the key requirement for verifying pleadings, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents. This affirmed the validity of the suit brought by the plaintiff company, Cardamom Marketing Co. (Travancore) Ltd. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 20 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101761