<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 335 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101758</link>
    <description>The court overruled the preliminary objection and held that the company petition under sections 397, 398, and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 was maintainable. It found that the petitioner was a member of the respondent-company, as evidenced by the company&#039;s treatment and recognition of his shareholder status. The court determined that the petitioner met the necessary qualifications under section 399 to file the petition, having an indisputable title to membership. Further proceedings were scheduled in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:27:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 335 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101758</link>
      <description>The court overruled the preliminary objection and held that the company petition under sections 397, 398, and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 was maintainable. It found that the petitioner was a member of the respondent-company, as evidenced by the company&#039;s treatment and recognition of his shareholder status. The court determined that the petitioner met the necessary qualifications under section 399 to file the petition, having an indisputable title to membership. Further proceedings were scheduled in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>