<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 416 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101740</link>
    <description>Where the principal debt is admitted and the objection to interest is not bona fide, the company court in winding-up proceedings may determine liability for interest to avoid multiplicity of litigation. The Court treated the admitted debt, prior demand, absence of denial, and repeated assurances to settle as sufficient to entertain the interest claim, and it fixed a reasonable commercial rate rather than the rates sought by either side. Interest was directed at 12 per cent per annum from the date of demand, with credit for payments already made on the relevant dates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:24:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 416 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101740</link>
      <description>Where the principal debt is admitted and the objection to interest is not bona fide, the company court in winding-up proceedings may determine liability for interest to avoid multiplicity of litigation. The Court treated the admitted debt, prior demand, absence of denial, and repeated assurances to settle as sufficient to entertain the interest claim, and it fixed a reasonable commercial rate rather than the rates sought by either side. Interest was directed at 12 per cent per annum from the date of demand, with credit for payments already made on the relevant dates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>