<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 370 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101731</link>
    <description>The court allowed the company&#039;s application to amend the petition by adding respondents and additional prayers, despite objections from certain respondents. The judge granted the amendments, considering the relevance of subsequent events in deciding the petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The court emphasized the permissibility of amending to properly determine issues between parties and highlighted the grievances of the petitioners as both directors and shareholders. The judge&#039;s summons were made absolute for amending the petition, allowing for further filings and setting timelines for responses, with a hearing scheduled after six weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:07:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 370 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101731</link>
      <description>The court allowed the company&#039;s application to amend the petition by adding respondents and additional prayers, despite objections from certain respondents. The judge granted the amendments, considering the relevance of subsequent events in deciding the petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The court emphasized the permissibility of amending to properly determine issues between parties and highlighted the grievances of the petitioners as both directors and shareholders. The judge&#039;s summons were made absolute for amending the petition, allowing for further filings and setting timelines for responses, with a hearing scheduled after six weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>