<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 421 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101716</link>
    <description>Under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956, the company court cannot compel disclosure of reasons for refusing registration of a share transfer because section 111(5A) gave that power expressly to the Central Government on appeal, and no similar authority was conferred on the court. Where the articles of association give the board absolute discretion to refuse registration without assigning reasons, judicial interference is justified only on positive proof of mala fide, arbitrariness, caprice, oppression or action contrary to the company&#039;s interests. Mere allegations, or selective acceptance of other transfers, are insufficient to establish abuse of power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:48:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 421 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101716</link>
      <description>Under section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956, the company court cannot compel disclosure of reasons for refusing registration of a share transfer because section 111(5A) gave that power expressly to the Central Government on appeal, and no similar authority was conferred on the court. Where the articles of association give the board absolute discretion to refuse registration without assigning reasons, judicial interference is justified only on positive proof of mala fide, arbitrariness, caprice, oppression or action contrary to the company&#039;s interests. Mere allegations, or selective acceptance of other transfers, are insufficient to establish abuse of power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>