<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 247 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101700</link>
    <description>Interim restraint on transfer of a company&#039;s assets may be modified where a supervised sale better preserves stakeholder value. In light of financial distress, discharge of substantial tax liabilities, revival of operations, and deterioration of buses after prolonged idleness, the Court permitted sale by private negotiations in the presence of a Local Commissioner. The sale proceeds were required to be deposited in a scheduled bank, existing shareholders were to be given an opportunity to purchase at a higher price, and the sale remained subject to Court confirmation. The controlled process was used to protect the company, shareholders, and prospective purchasers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 247 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101700</link>
      <description>Interim restraint on transfer of a company&#039;s assets may be modified where a supervised sale better preserves stakeholder value. In light of financial distress, discharge of substantial tax liabilities, revival of operations, and deterioration of buses after prolonged idleness, the Court permitted sale by private negotiations in the presence of a Local Commissioner. The sale proceeds were required to be deposited in a scheduled bank, existing shareholders were to be given an opportunity to purchase at a higher price, and the sale remained subject to Court confirmation. The controlled process was used to protect the company, shareholders, and prospective purchasers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>