https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101686 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding insufficient evidence to support allegations of clandestine activities. Lack of concrete proof, discrepancies in statements, and absence of substantial evidence weakened the Revenue's case. Despite suspicions raised by missing records, the Tribunal found the evidence presented by the Revenue to be insufficient. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was granted to the appellants. en-us Mon, 11 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:04:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101686 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding insufficient evidence to support allegations of clandestine activities. Lack of concrete proof, discrepancies in statements, and absence of substantial evidence weakened the Revenue's case. Despite suspicions raised by missing records, the Tribunal found the evidence presented by the Revenue to be insufficient. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was granted to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101686