<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 681 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101680</link>
    <description>Assessable value could not be determined on the existing record because the nature of the finished goods and the character of the bought-out items were not clearly established. Without clear factual findings, the conclusion on includibility of those items in valuation could not be sustained. The appellate authority was required to examine the material facts, apply its mind to the valuation issue, and record a reasoned decision. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law, leaving the includibility question open for reconsideration on the evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 681 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101680</link>
      <description>Assessable value could not be determined on the existing record because the nature of the finished goods and the character of the bought-out items were not clearly established. Without clear factual findings, the conclusion on includibility of those items in valuation could not be sustained. The appellate authority was required to examine the material facts, apply its mind to the valuation issue, and record a reasoned decision. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication in accordance with law, leaving the includibility question open for reconsideration on the evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>