https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101674 The High Court allowed the appeal in a case concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition for interim relief to employees of a government company. The Court disagreed with the initial dismissal based on territorial jurisdiction, citing the company's head office being within its jurisdiction. The appeal was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings, directing re-admittance of the writ petition. The respondent company was ordered to cover appeal costs. The judgment highlighted the significance of territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 in cases involving government entities and upheld the trade union's right to seek relief from the company's head office within the court's jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 13 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:10:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101674 The High Court allowed the appeal in a case concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition for interim relief to employees of a government company. The Court disagreed with the initial dismissal based on territorial jurisdiction, citing the company's head office being within its jurisdiction. The appeal was remanded to the trial court for further proceedings, directing re-admittance of the writ petition. The respondent company was ordered to cover appeal costs. The judgment highlighted the significance of territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 in cases involving government entities and upheld the trade union's right to seek relief from the company's head office within the court's jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 13 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101674