<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 836 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101665</link>
    <description>Admissions made during inspection, together with shortage of raw materials and unrecorded finished goods, support a finding of clandestine manufacture and removal without payment of central excise duty, so the demand and penalty were sustained on merits. Where clearances crossed the exemption threshold under Notification No. 1/93, duty had to be recomputed at the concessional rate applicable immediately beyond the limit, and the penalty had to be reconsidered on the basis of the re-quantified duty. The matter therefore required fresh quantification of both duty and consequential penalty under the applicable exemption notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 836 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101665</link>
      <description>Admissions made during inspection, together with shortage of raw materials and unrecorded finished goods, support a finding of clandestine manufacture and removal without payment of central excise duty, so the demand and penalty were sustained on merits. Where clearances crossed the exemption threshold under Notification No. 1/93, duty had to be recomputed at the concessional rate applicable immediately beyond the limit, and the penalty had to be reconsidered on the basis of the re-quantified duty. The matter therefore required fresh quantification of both duty and consequential penalty under the applicable exemption notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>