<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 833 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101660</link>
    <description>An appellate order denying credit-related relief was found unsustainable because it rested on incorrect assumptions about the inputs and final products and reflected a mechanical adoption of an earlier decision without independent application of mind. The order was therefore set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on merits. The appellate authority was directed to afford the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing before deciding the matter anew.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:47:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 833 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101660</link>
      <description>An appellate order denying credit-related relief was found unsustainable because it rested on incorrect assumptions about the inputs and final products and reflected a mechanical adoption of an earlier decision without independent application of mind. The order was therefore set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on merits. The appellate authority was directed to afford the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing before deciding the matter anew.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>