https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101659 Revision jurisdiction will not be invoked merely to challenge incidental observations in an order whose operative result is otherwise against the applicant, and interference under Section 115 CPC was declined on that ground. The proposed amendment seeking a declaration of dissolution and consequential liquidation relief was also upheld as untenable on the pleaded facts, so no revisional error was shown in refusing it. Appointment of a liquidator was confirmed as proper to ascertain assets and liabilities, and the court accepted an ancillary direction allowing the legal representatives to continue the business as agents of the liquidator on terms to be certified by the trial court. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:44:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101659 Revision jurisdiction will not be invoked merely to challenge incidental observations in an order whose operative result is otherwise against the applicant, and interference under Section 115 CPC was declined on that ground. The proposed amendment seeking a declaration of dissolution and consequential liquidation relief was also upheld as untenable on the pleaded facts, so no revisional error was shown in refusing it. Appointment of a liquidator was confirmed as proper to ascertain assets and liabilities, and the court accepted an ancillary direction allowing the legal representatives to continue the business as agents of the liquidator on terms to be certified by the trial court. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 17 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101659