<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 827 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101648</link>
    <description>An adjudication order was interfered with for breach of natural justice because the show cause notice was not shown to have reached the proper party after transfer of the licence, and no effective opportunity to reply was afforded. To secure fair procedure, the order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after service of notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:23:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 827 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101648</link>
      <description>An adjudication order was interfered with for breach of natural justice because the show cause notice was not shown to have reached the proper party after transfer of the licence, and no effective opportunity to reply was afforded. To secure fair procedure, the order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after service of notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>