<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 331 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101637</link>
    <description>For a liquidator&#039;s claim to recover unpaid call money, limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 runs from the winding-up order, and section 458A of the Companies Act, 1956 requires exclusion of both the pre-order winding-up period and the one-year period after the order while computing time. On that basis, the claims were treated as within limitation. The article also notes that interest at twelve per cent was not supported by any company resolution authorising that rate; in the absence of such authority, only reasonable interest from the date of filing of the claim was justified, and the interest rate was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 331 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101637</link>
      <description>For a liquidator&#039;s claim to recover unpaid call money, limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 runs from the winding-up order, and section 458A of the Companies Act, 1956 requires exclusion of both the pre-order winding-up period and the one-year period after the order while computing time. On that basis, the claims were treated as within limitation. The article also notes that interest at twelve per cent was not supported by any company resolution authorising that rate; in the absence of such authority, only reasonable interest from the date of filing of the claim was justified, and the interest rate was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>