<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 801 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101620</link>
    <description>Duty demand based on a 5% free supply shown in invoices could not be sustained where the department failed to establish a short levy on the basis of the declared sale price and assessable value. The record showed that duty had been paid on the clearances, including the free-supply component, and no mathematical or evidentiary basis was produced to demonstrate that the invoiced value resulted in under-assessment. As the alleged short levy was not proved, the demand and penalty were set aside and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:47:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 801 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101620</link>
      <description>Duty demand based on a 5% free supply shown in invoices could not be sustained where the department failed to establish a short levy on the basis of the declared sale price and assessable value. The record showed that duty had been paid on the clearances, including the free-supply component, and no mathematical or evidentiary basis was produced to demonstrate that the invoiced value resulted in under-assessment. As the alleged short levy was not proved, the demand and penalty were set aside and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>