https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101604 The court rejected the winding-up petition filed by M/s. Anand Steels against Bharath Earth Movers Ltd. for non-payment of a disputed debt. The court emphasized that unresolved disputes over delivery of goods should be addressed in a civil court, where proper evidence can be presented and specific issues raised. It highlighted the importance of detailed evidence and legal proceedings in resolving complex disputes, indicating that the summary jurisdiction of the company court was not suitable for determining such contentious issues. en-us Thu, 18 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:13:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101604 The court rejected the winding-up petition filed by M/s. Anand Steels against Bharath Earth Movers Ltd. for non-payment of a disputed debt. The court emphasized that unresolved disputes over delivery of goods should be addressed in a civil court, where proper evidence can be presented and specific issues raised. It highlighted the importance of detailed evidence and legal proceedings in resolving complex disputes, indicating that the summary jurisdiction of the company court was not suitable for determining such contentious issues. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 18 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101604